Walk This Way

What´s the story with infrastructure of the current European standard type in Ireland, and why does there appear to be such opposition to it? When, after decades of delay and multiples over budget, projects of this standard are completed, the hubris of the government is palpable, seemingly unaware that such offerings are common place in the common market. Though standards vary, you will find that most of western Europe countries have a functioning; road / bicycle / pedestrian / public transport system, in, and out, of the cities.

Clearly, fantastic projects have been completed, and in a really cool way that is unique to Ireland, other times the approach is just plain odd. When the new speed limit signs started to appear some years back, some of them were no bigger than a dinner plate adorned with completely inappropriate speed limits in relation to the roads in which they were planted, whether it was the 50KM limit attached to a dual carriageway just outside of Galway city, or the 80KM sign in Clarenbridge village, on a road which ended 100 hundred meters after the sign.

Then there is the curious incident of the newly installed bicycle path on the 10KM stretch of road between Kilcolgan and Kinvara, which carries a lot of tourists and a lot of tourist money. This is a particularly treacherous stretch of road and has taken more than a few lives of those trying to leisurely make their way to Kinvara or the Burren Beyond. So when it seemed that out of nowhere a bicycle path was to be installed there was a sense of relief. Though that relief soon turned to confusion when it was discovered that this path would take up no more than one of that ten km stretch, starting somewhere in the middle and ending abruptly, though clearly posted so, in the bushes. What must these tourists think?, likely that this is a mad little country that doesn’t really believe in reinvesting tourist revenue into even semi safe access to the places that have drawn that tourist Euro here in the first place.

As Ireland is not a developing country, the level of poor infrastructure planning and implementation that exists is unacceptable. Higher tax rates are often cited as a reason why neighbouring governments have been able to provide so much more for the people. But the myth of higher taxes, for example in Sweden in relation to Ireland is soon dismantled, on the level of actual tax paid, and the incomparable `bang for your buck´. It would be interesting to know what for example has Holland produced with the equivalent billions that the Irish government received from the EU + Irish Taxpayer over the past few decades. It certainly smells like corruption on a monumental scale – while conducting a survey earlier in the millennium on European road building projects, a Danish firm discovered that Ireland was an average of 85% over budget.

A lot has been done and things are getting better, and its important to have a positive outlook, but all the positive development in the world shouldn’t negate the responsibility for the current lack of imagination, or the billions that were squandered, badly managed, or just plain robbed by those in control. And, if it is just an extreme lack of knowing (it´s not), why not simply emulate what other countries have successfully provided, `decades´ ago.

This small country has produced some of the best athletes, artists, musicians and creativity on the planet, clearly Ireland is capable of so much more, so why is it that more often than not, so much less is the result. Cliches such as; cronyism, cute whorism, and “ara she´ll be grand” are no longer amusing nor charming enough to validate the crime that is the lack of value for money that Ireland receives for its infrastructure spending. It would at least be something if the problem was lack of funding, but Ireland has at the very least equalled the infrastructure spending of its European neighbours, with a vastly different ROI. Spend a few days in the neighbouring countries to `really´ compare what they have been provided.

Imagine if they stopped building unsightly and poorly designed housing estates, and instead focused on creating modern versions of sustainable and community friendly villages. What if instead of gambling the country´s future on the tax revenue of other countries companies, we developed a dynamic eco tourism industry, protecting what´s left of our beautiful landscape while generating essential and ethical revenue. Why not instead of spreading the plague of grotesque shopping malls and foreign super chains, we aggressively promoted and supported the return of organic growers, suppliers and retailers. Why not instead of allowing beautiful countryside robbing speculation buildings, we focused on designing a comprehensive, non intrusive, path system all over the country.

A system of paths that would provide easy access to the wonderful places in this country, with paths along the rivers, commuter routes to work and school, creating an invaluable asset to an invaluable country, not to mention providing simple joy for all the walkers, hikers, cyclists and dreamers of Ireland. That one could walk or cycle all over the country, or to just simply walk to the shop without taking your life into your hands. Imagine what that would do for; tourism and healthy lifestyles, reducing pollution, road deaths and traffic congestion, improving workplace production, while simultaneously increasing quality of life. They don’t have to build the beauty, it´s already there in abundance, just some non combustion type means of accessing it.

As a builder myself I know that there would of course be challenges, but most definitely not unsurmountable ones. It could be quite rudimentary to begin with, continuing development over time. The farmer question is of course front and center, their concerns are legitimate, though the safer roads and increased tourist revenue alone might be a reason enough to make a deal.


Losing our own natural instincts fosters vulnerability to persuasion by external forces, benevolent and not, most likely not though, as benevolence tends not to interfere with free will. Free will of the organism being of the upmost importance, as it is appears to be a central factor in long term development, long term for an organism is `not´ a hundred years.

Everything that exists in Man today has most likely always existed. Albeit slowly, we were finally making progress in moving away from a period in time where some of those ways of being were not publicly acceptable. Then it seems that all of a sudden, boom, everything needs to be accepted right now, without any reservations, by everyone, lest you be a bigot, or a racist, or a …., or a ……., hardly what one would call a superb negotiation tactic. So what has changed bar another direction of bigotry?. There are many on this planet whom will never accept (choose your thing) and so be it, others may just need a little more time, why not let them have it, I mean, are we going anywhere?

That forcing someone to accept in totality what you believe to be righteous is a 100% failure rate, is probably one of the safest bets that exists. This of course doesn’t mean that we should accept any level of intolerance, for there are of course `levels of intolerance´. For example, “While I support same sex marriage, I choose not to include gay people in my social circle” to “I do not support same sex marriage and will use the courts to express that” to “I believe that homosexuality is an affront to God and deserves to be punished by death” Two of those levels should be tolerated.

Point being, whatever is pushing this agenda certainly does not in actuality support the individuals they claim to be championing. It seems that there is more and more schooling these days from the mainstream media and the like on how we should think, what we should accept, and whom are the righteous, all of course in the name of equality and freedom for all.

That the MSM is just one tool of TPTB (five corporations hold 80% of the market space) shouldn’t at this point in time be a surprise to most. If we believe that these mega corporations really do have our best intentions at heart, and we should therefore accept their word as dogma, than we really have wandered a little too far down the Yellow Brick Road.

Justifying perpetual war and the disruption of society with touch feely subjects that seem hard to deny is one of the oldest tricks in the book. No, these entities have something else in mind behind the endless jamming together of the unwilling.